Organizations, assets + field operations
PUT THE RIGHT VERIFICATION AT THE POINT OF USE.
Connect a physical asset to approved records, workflows, or verification experiences without publishing the private implementation behind them.
Field-service asset
Applied beside the inspection plate
The emblem identifies the physical touchpoint; access rules decide what each person is allowed to see.
One platform · this application
THE INDUSTRY CHANGES.
THE PLATFORM DOES NOT.
A premium physical product is the deployment layer and valuable commercial entry point. Persistent identity connects it to a governed platform that can keep approved information, records, experiences, and actions useful over time.
STATE OF STICK PLATFORM
Identity
A shared, serialized, or higher-assurance record appropriate to the product and risk.
Management
Organization-controlled destinations, content, lifecycle states, and roles.
Analytics
Aggregate interaction and action signals tied to the physical touchpoint.
Authorization + verification
Approved access and trust signals without treating every interaction as authentication.
AI experiences
Optional assistance grounded in approved content—not the authority for safety, identity, or compliance.
Lifecycle records
Guidance, service, warranty, provenance, replacement, and next actions over time.
The responsible organization remains the authority for its records, instructions, access rules, claims, and systems of record. Connectivity can use the technology appropriate to the program; identification is not automatically authentication.
See the idea in action
THE EMBLEM IS THIN.
THE EXPERIENCE IS DEEP.
The physical piece belongs on the object. A tap opens the useful information, story, service, or action that should travel with it.
THINLow-profile emblem
TAPNo app required
LIVEContent can evolve
STATE OF STICK, CO.Asset verification
UNIT MX-118
Approved record found
- Inspection
- Service
Verify status
Open service record
Start inspection
Recommended first move
START WITH ONE
CREDIBLE PILOT.
A controlled single-workflow verification pilot with an authoritative record, explicit threat model, revocation path, and measured operational outcome.
Tiered connected and verification architecture
Brand-controlled records and access paths
Private implementation with customer-safe public outcomes
These are available system paths, not claims that a specific organization has adopted or approved them.
Who usually owns the conversation
THE RIGHT BUYING TEAM
- Operations lead
- Security or risk owner
- Quality or compliance lead
- Field service lead
- Asset or product manager
What we decide together
QUESTIONS BEFORE FEATURES
- 01What must a person know or verify at the asset?
- 02Who is the authoritative system of record?
- 03What happens when a tag, record, or asset is compromised?
- 04Which security, compliance, retention, and access requirements govern the workflow?
Practical concerns
ANSWER THE OBJECTIONS.
CAN THIS MAKE COUNTERFEITING IMPOSSIBLE?
No system should be sold as counterfeit-proof. The correct goal is an appropriate verification method, authoritative records, monitoring, and a response path.
WHO IT SERVES
- Manufacturers and operators
- Field service organizations
- Asset owners
- Training and compliance teams
WHAT IT CAN DO
- Asset verification
- Product identity
- Tamper awareness
- Service and inspection records
- Field workflows
WHY IT MATTERS
- Faster verification
- Clearer records
- Reduced operational friction
- Appropriate trust signals
The first useful question
We start with the commercial and human outcome, then decide whether the object should be physical-only, connected, or authenticated.